OK, thanks! Eugene > You are correct, that is easier. I thought that it calls the probe > function directly and bypasses the normal probe handling, but that > is not the case. Sorry for the noise. > > Guenter
OK, thanks! Eugene > You are correct, that is easier. I thought that it calls the probe > function directly and bypasses the normal probe handling, but that > is not the case. Sorry for the noise. > > Guenter