Re: [PATCH 1/4] hwmon: (asus-ec-sensors) introduce ec_board_info struct for board data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/30/22 00:51, Eugene Shalygin wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 22:28, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 3/29/22 12:22, Eugene Shalygin wrote:
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 15:44, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    struct ec_sensors_data {
-     unsigned long board_sensors;
+     struct ec_board_info board_info;

Please explain why this needs to be the entire structure and not
just a pointer to it.

I marked the board_info array as __initconst assuming that this large
array will be unloaded from memory after the init phase, while we keep
only a single element. Is that assumption incorrect?


What happens if you build the driver into the kernel and then instantiate
and de-instantiate it multiple times ?

Sorry, I have no idea because I don't know how to load a built-in
driver multiple times. But since this driver is attached to a
motherboard device, which is persistent and always single, do I need
to consider such a scenario?


Drivers have "unbind" and "bind" attributes, which can be used to unbind/bind
the driver mutliple times. That is quite useful for testing, including for
built-in drivers. As long as the attributes exists, they have to be supported.
This is not about having to consider a scenario, it is about preventing crashes
if existing functionality is used.

Having said that, I notice that the probe function is marked __init. I guess
I didn't pay attention. It may be interesting to build the driver into the
kernel, unbind/bind it, and see what happens.

Guenter



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux