Re: Reviving Support for it87.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/26/22 02:38, Frank Crawford wrote:
Folks,

For sometime there has been no activity to update the it87 module, but
for I've been collecting the various suggested patches and I've tested a
number of them and am keen get these into the official kernel.

In fact the biggest set of patches are the set that seems to have come
from here in late 2016 but never seems to have made it into the official
kernel.

How can I go about getting this moving again?


If you refer to my earlier patches, there are two problems with them.
First, they were not in a form acceptable for upstream submission
(one patch per logical change).
Second, and more severe, a lot of the code is experimental and
sometimes caused problems (restarts) on my systems. This was
especially the case if the hardware had a second device (another
it87xx or an embedded controller) accessing the chip in parallel.
I had tried some workarounds, but never really managed to stabilize
the code. While this is kind of ok for out-of-tree code, it isn't
acceptable for the upstream kernel. Getting support from ITE and/or
from a board vendor was all but impossible. ITE typically doesn't
even admit that a chip exists, and all I got from board vendors
- if anything - was "we don't support Linux". I don't know if it
is even remotely possible to fix those problems without support
from ITE and/or board vendors.

Guenter



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux