Experiments with MAX6680 and MAX6681 show that the alert function of those chips is broken, similar to other chips supported by the lm90 driver. Mark it accordingly. Fixes: 4667bcb8d8fc ("hwmon: (lm90) Introduce chip parameter structure") Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c index 280ae5f58187..06cb971c889b 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static const struct lm90_params lm90_params[] = { }, [max6680] = { .flags = LM90_HAVE_OFFSET | LM90_HAVE_CRIT - | LM90_HAVE_CRIT_ALRM_SWP, + | LM90_HAVE_CRIT_ALRM_SWP | LM90_HAVE_BROKEN_ALERT, .alert_alarms = 0x7c, .max_convrate = 7, }, -- 2.33.0