On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 11:07 PM Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 18:03:25 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:29 PM Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
...
> > > +static int nct6775_lock(struct nct6775_data *data)
> > > +{
> > > + mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void nct6775_unlock(struct nct6775_data *data, struct
> > > device *dev) +{
> > > + mutex_unlock(&data->update_lock);
> > > +}
> >
> > Have you run `sparse` against this?
> > Install `sparse` in your distribution and make kernel with
> > `make W=1 C=1 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ ...`
> >
> > It might require using special annotations to these functions to make
> > static analysers happy.
>
> Thank you, I will validate my patches before sending with sparse also.
>
> I have tried with sparse==0.6.4:
> ---
> $ make CC="ccache gcc" W=1 C=2 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ 2>&1 | grep
> nct6775 -n5
> ....
> 27219- CHECK drivers/hwmon/nct6683.c
> 27220: CHECK drivers/hwmon/nct6775.c
> 27221- CHECK drivers/hwmon/nct7802.c
> ....
> ---
>
> It has not showed any warnings. Have I missed some flag?
No, you are all good!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
