On Fri, 24 Sept 2021 at 21:53, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 9/24/21 11:59 AM, Avri Altman wrote:
> >>> Since fragment 'SCSI_UFS_HWMON' can't be build as a module,
> >>> 'SCSI_UFS_HWMON' has to depend on 'HWMON=y'.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: e88e2d32200a ("scsi: ufs: core: Probe for temperature
> >>> notification support")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig b/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig index
> >>> 565e8aa6319d..30c6edb53be9 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ config SCSI_UFS_FAULT_INJECTION
> >>>
> >>> config SCSI_UFS_HWMON
> >>> bool "UFS Temperature Notification"
> >>> - depends on SCSI_UFSHCD && HWMON
> >>> + depends on SCSI_UFSHCD && HWMON=y
> >>> help
> >>> This provides support for UFS hardware monitoring. If enabled,
> >>> a hardware monitoring device will be created for the UFS device.
>
> Thinking about this, it should be possible to do it like this
> so that both SCSI_UFSHCD=m ad SCSI_HFS_HWMON=m would also work.
> I.e., this would allow more combinations of Kconfig settings to
> work. It only excludes SCSI_UFSH_HWMON=y and HWMON=m
>
> + depends on SCSI_UFSHCD=HWMON || HWMON=y
>
> OK, I have verified that this works (builds) in all allowed
> combinations. Anders, would you please resubmit the patch?
Yeah, I'll send the patch.
Cheers,
Anders
