It is good to me.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 09:42:12AM +0200, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
> From: Martin Hundebøll <mhu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The m10-bmc is used on the Silicom N5010 PAC too, so add it to list of
> m10bmc types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Hundebøll <mhu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Patch split out to separate mfd changes
>
> drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.c | 12 +++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.c
> index 1a9bfb7f48cd..8db3bcf5fccc 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel-m10-bmc.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,8 @@
>
> enum m10bmc_type {
> M10_N3000,
> - M10_D5005
> + M10_D5005,
> + M10_N5010,
> };
>
> static struct mfd_cell m10bmc_d5005_subdevs[] = {
> @@ -28,6 +29,10 @@ static struct mfd_cell m10bmc_pacn3000_subdevs[] = {
> { .name = "n3000bmc-secure" },
> };
>
> +static struct mfd_cell m10bmc_n5010_subdevs[] = {
> + { .name = "n5010bmc-hwmon" },
> +};
> +
> static const struct regmap_range m10bmc_regmap_range[] = {
> regmap_reg_range(M10BMC_LEGACY_BUILD_VER, M10BMC_LEGACY_BUILD_VER),
> regmap_reg_range(M10BMC_SYS_BASE, M10BMC_SYS_END),
> @@ -192,6 +197,10 @@ static int intel_m10_bmc_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> cells = m10bmc_d5005_subdevs;
> n_cell = ARRAY_SIZE(m10bmc_d5005_subdevs);
> break;
> + case M10_N5010:
> + cells = m10bmc_n5010_subdevs;
> + n_cell = ARRAY_SIZE(m10bmc_n5010_subdevs);
> + break;
> default:
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> @@ -207,6 +216,7 @@ static int intel_m10_bmc_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> static const struct spi_device_id m10bmc_spi_id[] = {
> { "m10-n3000", M10_N3000 },
> { "m10-d5005", M10_D5005 },
> + { "m10-n5010", M10_N5010 },
> { }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, m10bmc_spi_id);
> --
> 2.31.0
