On 6/23/21 4:44 AM, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
On 21/06/2021 15.56, Tom Rix wrote:
On 6/21/21 12:06 AM, Martin Hundebøll wrote:
From: Debarati Biswas <debaratix.biswas@xxxxxxxxx>
Device Feature List (DFL) drivers may be defined in subdirectories
other
than drivers/fpga, and each DFL driver should have access to the Device
Feature Header (DFH) register, which contains revision and type
information. This change moves the macros specific to the DFH register
from drivers/fpga/dfl.h to include/linux/dfl.h.
Signed-off-by: Debarati Biswas <debaratix.biswas@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Russ Weight <russell.h.weight@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Martin Hundebøll <mhu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/fpga/dfl.h | 48 +----------------------------------------
include/linux/dfl.h | 52
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.h b/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
index 2b82c96ba56c..6ed0353e9a99 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
+++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/bitfield.h>
bitfield.h was added to linux/dfl.h
Likely both aren't needed, try removing this one.
After this patch both headers use GENMASK_ULL() and BIT_ULL(), which
are both defined in linux/bits.h, so I would expect both to include
that instead. A lot of the users of dfl.h uses FIELD_GET(), which is
defined in linux/bitfield.h, so I would expect that to be included
there instead.
I can prepare a patch to fix that up, if you like?
A rule of thumb, if your commit says 'A and B' , likely it should only be A.
Remove the the linux/bitfield.h from drivers/fpga/dfl.h
Leave the linux/bitfield.h as-is in include/linux/dfl.h
If you feel include/linux/dfl.h can be optimized by the reduction of
linux/bitfield.h to linux/bits.h, do that as a follow on patchset.
Tom
// Martin
