On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 06:27:50PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 17.06.2021 18:12, Guenter Roeck пишет:
> >> For now I see that the rising edge isn't needed, the TEMP_ALERT goes
> >> HIGH by itself when temperature backs to normal. But I will try to
> >> double check.
> >>
> > The point is that a sysfs event should be sent to userspace on both
> > edges, not only when an alarm is raised. But, you are correct,
> > IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING is currently not needed since sysfs events
> > are not generated.
>
> Ok, thank you for the clarification.
>
> >>> Anyway, the tegra30 dts files in the upstream kernel either use
> >>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW or no interrupts for nct1008. The Nexus 7 dts file
> >>> in the upstream kernel has no interrupt configured (and coincidentally
> >>> it was you who added that entry). Where do you see IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ?
> >> I have a patch that will add the interrupt property, it's stashed
> >> locally for the next kernel release.
> >>
> >> IIUC, it's not only the Tegra30 dts, but all the TegraXXX boards that
> >> use IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW are in the same position.
> > I still don't see a IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH, though.
>
> Could you please clarify why you're looking for HIGH and not for LOW?
> The TEMP_ALERT is active-low.
Because you stated earlier:
"... cargo-culted and wrong because they use IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH ..."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Guenter
