Hi Guenter, On 3/5/21 21:18, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:52:58AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning >> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall >> through to the next case. >> >> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 >> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- > > I Acked those, thus assuming that they would be applied through some > other tree. If that is not the case, you'll need to let me know. The > resend only means to me that whatever tree was supposed to pick it up > did not do it, but it doesn't result in any action from my side. If you don't mind, I'm taking this in my -next[1] branch for v5.14. Thanks -- Gustavo [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/kspp > > Guenter > >> drivers/hwmon/max6621.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/max6621.c b/drivers/hwmon/max6621.c >> index 367855d5edae..7821132e17fa 100644 >> --- a/drivers/hwmon/max6621.c >> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/max6621.c >> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ max6621_is_visible(const void *data, enum hwmon_sensor_types type, u32 attr, >> default: >> break; >> } >> - >> + break; >> default: >> break; >> } >> -- >> 2.27.0 >>
