On 4/6/21 12:20 PM, Konstantin Aladyshev wrote: > Thanks for the comment. > Yes, you are correct, this patch adds an extra 'i2c_smbus_read_byte_data' call for the temp_max/temp_min reads. > I guess I did that intentionally because I just wanted to keep the restructured code concise. After all I thought, 'temp_input' generally is read more often than 'temp_max/temp_min'. > As I understand now, it seems like it is not acceptable. Therefore could you point me in the right direction about what I should do? > Should I just stick with the original driver version and simply add two more i2c call checks for the first operations for min/max? > Correct, it is not acceptable. A normal use case for hwmon devices is to use the "sensors" command which _will_ read all attributes. i2c reads are expensive, and unnecessary read operations should be avoided. There are several ways to solve the problem. Checking return values after each read is the simple option. There are other possibilities, such as reading the limits and the read order only once during probe, but I don't know enough about the hardware to suggest a more sophisticated solution. For example, I don't know what "CPU is off" means. Offline ? Not present ? If it means "not present", or if the status is permanent, the condition should be handled in the is_visible function (or the driver should not be instantiated in the first place). Otherwise, the code should possibly return -ENODATA instead of -ETIMEDOUT on error. But, again, I can not really suggest a better solution since I don't know enough (nothing, actually) about the hardware (and the public part of the SBTSI specification doesn't say anything about expected behavior for offline CPUs or CPU cores). What I did find, though, is that the driver does not implement temperature offset support, and it that doesn't support reporting alerts. I'd have assumed this to be more important than optimizing error handling, but that is just my personal opinion. Thanks, Guenter > Best regards, > Konstantin Aladyshev > > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 9:42 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > On 4/6/21 11:16 AM, Konstantin Aladyshev wrote: > > SBTSI sensors don't work when the CPU is off. > > In this case every 'i2c_smbus_read_byte_data' function would fail > > by a timeout. > > Currently temp1_max/temp1_min file reads can cause two such timeouts > > for every read. > > Restructure code so there will be no more than one timeout for every > > read operation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Aladyshev <aladyshev22@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:aladyshev22@xxxxxxxxx>> > > --- > > Changes in v2: > > - Fix typo in a commit message > > - Don't swap temp_int/temp_dec checks at the end of the 'sbtsi_read' function > > > > This doesn't explain the reason for the extra read operation for > limits. Preventing a second read in error cases is not an argument > for adding an extra read for non-error cases. > > Guenter > > > drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c b/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c > > index e35357c48b8e..4ae48635bb31 100644 > > --- a/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c > > @@ -74,48 +74,47 @@ static int sbtsi_read(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type, > > u32 attr, int channel, long *val) > > { > > struct sbtsi_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > + u8 temp_int_reg, temp_dec_reg; > > s32 temp_int, temp_dec; > > int err; > > > > switch (attr) { > > case hwmon_temp_input: > > - /* > > - * ReadOrder bit specifies the reading order of integer and > > - * decimal part of CPU temp for atomic reads. If bit == 0, > > - * reading integer part triggers latching of the decimal part, > > - * so integer part should be read first. If bit == 1, read > > - * order should be reversed. > > - */ > > - err = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_CONFIG); > > - if (err < 0) > > - return err; > > - > > - mutex_lock(&data->lock); > > - if (err & BIT(SBTSI_CONFIG_READ_ORDER_SHIFT)) { > > - temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC); > > - temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT); > > - } else { > > - temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT); > > - temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC); > > - } > > - mutex_unlock(&data->lock); > > + temp_int_reg = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT; > > + temp_dec_reg = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC; > > break; > > case hwmon_temp_max: > > - mutex_lock(&data->lock); > > - temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_INT); > > - temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_DEC); > > - mutex_unlock(&data->lock); > > + temp_int_reg = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_INT; > > + temp_dec_reg = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_DEC; > > break; > > case hwmon_temp_min: > > - mutex_lock(&data->lock); > > - temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_INT); > > - temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_DEC); > > - mutex_unlock(&data->lock); > > + temp_int_reg = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_INT; > > + temp_dec_reg = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_DEC; > > break; > > default: > > return -EINVAL; > > } > > > > + /* > > + * ReadOrder bit specifies the reading order of integer and > > + * decimal part of CPU temp for atomic reads. If bit == 0, > > + * reading integer part triggers latching of the decimal part, > > + * so integer part should be read first. If bit == 1, read > > + * order should be reversed. > > + */ > > + err = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_CONFIG); > > + if (err < 0) > > + return err; > > + > > + mutex_lock(&data->lock); > > + if (err & BIT(SBTSI_CONFIG_READ_ORDER_SHIFT)) { > > + temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, temp_dec_reg); > > + temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, temp_int_reg); > > + } else { > > + temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, temp_int_reg); > > + temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, temp_dec_reg); > > + } > > + mutex_unlock(&data->lock); > > > > if (temp_int < 0) > > return temp_int; > > >
