On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:42 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You don't > answer the basic question: What should the driver do if the iio > subsystem only delivers raw values ? I suggested we should just keep > the current assumption in this case, ie do the fixed conversion, > and let userspace handle any necessary adjustments. You seem to object. > With your patch, we get a comment in the driver suggesting that some > code should be removed. In my opinion, such a comment comment does > not add any value. Ether we drop the code or we don't, and I dislike > removing it. > > That results in my usual fallback: When in doubt, do nothing. OK I get it, I'll fix it up along with the confused bug pointed out by Chris and resend. Thanks! Linus Walleij
