Re: [PATCH 0/2] pwm-fan: Support multiple tach inputs & fix RPM calc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 at 16:38, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 10/4/20 1:49 AM, Paul Barker wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Sep 2020 at 19:09, Paul Barker <pbarker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> These changes were made to support a custom board where one PWM output
> >> is routed to two fans, each of which has a tachometer signal routed to a
> >> GPIO input on the SoC. While debugging on this board it was found that
> >> the RPM readings were being overestimated due to a bug in the
> >> calculation code so I've included a fix for that.
> >>
> >> As the custom board doesn't currently support the latest mainline kernel
> >> I've tested these changes on a SanCloud BeagleBone Enhanced using an
> >> oscilloscope to check the PWM output and a signal generator to simulate
> >> the fan tachometer signals. I've tested variants of the device tree with
> >> 0, 1 and 2 fan tachometer inputs configured to ensure the logic in the
> >> probe function is correct.
> >>
> >> The device tree bindings changes have been submitted in a separate
> >> patch.
> >>
> >> These changes can also be pulled from:
> >>
> >>   https://gitlab.com/pbarker.dev/staging/linux.git
> >>   tag: for-hwmon/pwm-fan_2020-09-20
> >>
> >> Paul Barker (2):
> >>   hwmon: pwm-fan: Support multiple tachometer inputs
> >>   hwmon: pwm-fan: Fix RPM calculation
> >>
> >>  drivers/hwmon/pwm-fan.c | 164 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> >>  1 file changed, 100 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>
> >> base-commit: 2835d860d3fcc3e4829e96987544e811d35dee48
> >
> > Ping on these, I've not had any feedback for 2 weeks.
> >
>
> Unfortunately the patches are a bit difficult to understand,
> and I did not have the time to fully analyze them. One thing I can say
> is that the order should be reversed - the bug fix should come first.
> Also, patch 2 adds a potential divide by 0 problem, if 'delta'
> happens to be 0.
>
> There are little details, such as replacing 'int pulses' with
> 'unsigned int pulses', which make things more difficult to review.
> atomic_t is int. Assigning it to an unsigned int _should_ not matter
> here, but again such little changes make it more difficult to review
> a patch because they require extra scrutiny.

Thanks for the feedback, I'll do some rework and re-submit. Probably
just the calculation fix first and then the support for multiple fan
tachometer inputs as a follow-up.

-- 
Paul Barker
Konsulko Group



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux