Hi Guenter
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 09:25, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 7/6/20 10:20 AM, Naveen Krishna Ch wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 at 22:47, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> The energy counters of certain models seems to be reporting
> >> inconsisten values. Hence, match for the supported models.
> > Actually, the supported models could be of family 0x17 in a range
> > between 0x30 ~ 0x3f. I did not find any macro or usage for a range
> > of models. Could you suggest to me if i've missed an existing way to
> > provide a range for models.
> >
> So, do you want me to apply the patch as-is, or are you going to send an
> updated version ?
Please take this patch as-is, i will update the supported models when ever
i get a chance to test on them.
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@xxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/hwmon/amd_energy.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/amd_energy.c b/drivers/hwmon/amd_energy.c
> >> index e95b7426106e..29603742c858 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/hwmon/amd_energy.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/amd_energy.c
> >> @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static struct platform_driver amd_energy_driver = {
> >> static struct platform_device *amd_energy_platdev;
> >>
> >> static const struct x86_cpu_id cpu_ids[] __initconst = {
> >> - X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM(AMD, 0x17, NULL),
> >> + X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(AMD, 0x17, 0x31, NULL),
> >> {}
> >> };
> >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, cpu_ids);
> >> --
> >> 2.17.1
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
Shine bright,
(: Nav :)
