Re: [RFC PATCH hwmon-next v1 5/5] hwmon: (pmbus/tps53679) Extend device list supported by driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/5/20 8:44 AM, Vadim Pasternak wrote:


-----Original Message-----
From: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@xxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2020 6:04 PM
To: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
vijaykhemka@xxxxxx
Cc: linux-hwmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH hwmon-next v1 5/5] hwmon: (pmbus/tps53679) Extend
device list supported by driver

On 1/5/20 2:58 AM, Vadim Pasternak wrote:
Extends driver with support of the additional devices:
Texas Instruments Dual channel DCAP+ multiphase controllers: TPS53688,
SN1906016.
Infineon Multi-phase Digital VR Controller Sierra devices XDPE12286C,
XDPE12284C, XDPE12283C, XDPE12254C and XDPE12250C.

Extend Kconfig with added devices.

Signed-off-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig    |  5 +++--
   drivers/hwmon/pmbus/tps53679.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
   2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig
index 59859979571d..9e3d197d5322 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig
@@ -200,10 +200,11 @@ config SENSORS_TPS40422
   	  be called tps40422.

   config SENSORS_TPS53679
-	tristate "TI TPS53679"
+	tristate "TI TPS53679, TPS53688, SN1906016, Infineon XDPE122xxx
family"
   	help
   	  If you say yes here you get hardware monitoring support for TI
-	  TPS53679.
+	  TPS53679, PS53688, SN1906016 and Infineon XDPE12286C,
XDPE12284C,

TPS53688. For the others, for some I can't even determine if they exist in the
first place (eg SN1906016, XPDE12250C) or how they would differ from other
variants (eg XPDE12284C vs. XPDE12284A).
And why would they all use the same bit map in the VOUT_MODE register, the
same number of PMBus pages (phases), and the same attributes in each page ?

Hi Guenter,

Thank you for reply.

On our new system we have device XPDE12284C equipped.
I tested this device.

Sounds good, but did you also make sure that all chips have the same number
of pages (phases), the same set of commands as the TI chip, and support the
same bit settings in VOUT_MODE ? It seems a bit unlikely that TI's register
definitions would make it into an Infineon chip.

Also, what about the SN1906016 ? I don't find that anywhere, except in one
place where it is listed as MCU from TI.

Infineon datasheet refers all these device as XDPE122xxC
family and it doesn't specify any differences in register map
between these devices.

That is a bit vague, especially when it includes devices which return
zero results with Google searches.

"A" vs. "C" may distinguish automotive vs. commercial; the "A" device
is listed under automotive. If the command set is the same, I don't
really want the "c" in the id.

Tomorrow we'll have guys from Infineon in our lab and I'll
verify if there is any difference.

Tell them that it isn't really helpful to keep their datasheets
under wrap. Unfortunately, TI started doing the same, which isn't
helpful either.

Thanks,
Guenter

If yes, I'll leave only XPDE12284C.


Thanks,
Guenter

+	  XDPE12283C, XDPE12254C, XDPE12250C devices.

   	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will
   	  be called tps53679.
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/tps53679.c
b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/tps53679.c index 7ce2fca4acde..f38eb116735b
100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/tps53679.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/tps53679.c
@@ -89,6 +89,13 @@ static int tps53679_probe(struct i2c_client
*client,

   static const struct i2c_device_id tps53679_id[] = {
   	{"tps53679", 0},
+	{"tps53688", 0},
+	{"sn1906016", 0},
+	{"xdpe12283c", 0},
+	{"xdpe12250c", 0},
+	{"xdpe12254c", 0},
+	{"xdpe12284c", 0},
+	{"xdpe12286c", 0},

Alphabetic order, please.

   	{}
   };

@@ -96,6 +103,13 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tps53679_id);

   static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused tps53679_of_match[] = {
   	{.compatible = "ti,tps53679"},
+	{.compatible = "ti,tps53688"},
+	{.compatible = "ti,sn1906016"},
+	{.compatible = "infineon,xdpe12283c"},
+	{.compatible = "infineon,xdpe12250c"},
+	{.compatible = "infineon,xdpe12254c"},
+	{.compatible = "infineon,xdpe12284c"},
+	{.compatible = "infineon,xdpe12286c"},
   	{}
   };
   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, tps53679_of_match);






[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux