> The callback, just like getclock(), is from the existing i2c-algo-pcf, > which I don't want to touch right now. So I'm afraid it has to stay, > even if it returns a fixed number. Sure. I was just thinking loud and did not expect you to do it. Maybe I will do it once your driver is upstream. > Touching or forking i2c-algo-pcf will be necessary in order to > implement IRQ support, if I ever get around to it. I've wasted too > much time on debugging IRQ support, and would rather do it another > time, if ever ;) I've left a comment block at the start of i2c-icy.c > for anyone interested in the gory details. Yeah, I read it. I like such documentation. Really helpful! > If this is okay with you, I'll send another round of patches. :) Perfect!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
