Le jeu. 25 juil. 2019 à 19:47, Paul Burton <paul.burton@xxxxxxxx> a
écrit :
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 06:02:06PM -0400, Paul Cercueil wrote:
Move all the platform data to devicetree.
Nice! :)
The only bit dropped is the PWM beeper, which requires the PWM
driver
to be updated. I figured it's okay to remove it here since it's
really
a non-critical device, and it'll be re-introduced soon enough.
OK, I can see that being a price worth paying. Though it's possible to
include the binding at least for that in this series I'd be even
happier. Actually I see we already have
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/ingenic,jz47xx-pwm.txt
in mainline - what needs to change with it?
The PWM driver will be updated to use the TCU clocks and the regmap
provided
by the TCU driver. The PWM node will be a sub-node of the TCU one.
Additionally, there is this[1] ongoing discussion about PWM which makes
me uneasy about how to write the binding. So I'd rather not rush it,
because once the devicetree is written, it's ABI.
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/22/607
+ spi {
+ compatible = "spi-gpio";
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ sck-gpios = <&gpc 23 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ mosi-gpios = <&gpc 22 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+ cs-gpios = <&gpc 21 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ num-chipselects = <1>;
+
+ spi@0 {
+ compatible = "ili8960";
Should this be "ilitek,ili8960"?
Is there a binding & driver for this submitted somewhere? If not then
do
we need this at all? It doesn't look like the existing platform data
would actually lead to a driver being loaded so I'm wondering if we
can
just drop this until such a driver (or at least a documented DT
binding)
exists.
I can drop it. There is no driver for it, and I'm not even sure the LB60
has a ILI8960 in the first place.
Thanks,
Paul
