Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (da9052) Synchronize access with mfd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/18/19 7:29 AM, Samu Nuutamo wrote:
When tsi-as-adc is configured it is possible for in7[0123]_input read to

in{70,71,72,73}_input ?

return an incorrect value if a concurrent read to in[456]_input is
performed. This is likely caused by a concurrent manipulation of the mux
channel without proper locking as hwmon and mfd use different locks for
synchronization.

Switch hwmon to use the same lock as mfd when accessing the TSI channel.

Fixes: 4f16cab19a3d5 ("hwmon: da9052: Add support for TSI channel")
Signed-off-by: Samu Nuutamo <samu.nuutamo@xxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/hwmon/da9052-hwmon.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/da9052-hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/da9052-hwmon.c
index 8ec5bf4ce392..af136a638065 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/da9052-hwmon.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/da9052-hwmon.c
@@ -249,9 +249,9 @@ static ssize_t da9052_tsi_show(struct device *dev,
  	int channel = to_sensor_dev_attr(devattr)->index;
  	int ret;
- mutex_lock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&hwmon->da9052->auxadc_lock);

This is, at best, a kludge.

The hwmon driver doesn't own struct da9052 and should not really access any of its
structure members. The problem suggests that __da9052_read_tsi() should have
been implemented in the mfd core, similar to da9052_adc_manual_read().

Guenter

  	ret = __da9052_read_tsi(dev, channel);
-	mutex_unlock(&hwmon->hwmon_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&hwmon->da9052->auxadc_lock);
if (ret < 0)
  		return ret;





[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux