On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 12:55:15AM +0800, John Garry wrote: > Currently when we request an IO port region, the request is made directly > to the top resource, ioport_resource. > > There is an issue here, in that drivers may request an IO port region even > if the IO port region has not even been mapped in (in pci_remap_iospace()). > > This may lead to crashes when the PCI host has not enumerated prior to > accessing the IO port region, as below: > > root@(none)$ insmod f71805f.ko > [ 32.264016] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff7dfffee0002e > [ 32.279936] Mem abort info: > [ 32.285536] ESR = 0x96000046 > [ 32.291657] Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits > [ 32.303542] SET = 0, FnV = 0 > [ 32.309661] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 > [ 32.315957] Data abort info: > [ 32.321728] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000046 > [ 32.329420] CM = 0, WnR = 1 > [ 32.335367] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp = (____ptrval____) > [ 32.349174] [ffff7dfffee0002e] pgd=0000000001392003, pud=0000000001393003, pmd=0000000000000000 > [ 32.366652] Internal error: Oops: 96000046 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > [ 32.377835] Modules linked in: f71805f(+) > [ 32.385876] CPU: 4 PID: 2681 Comm: insmod Not tainted 5.0.0-00003-ga6247cc0f8f2 #52 > [ 32.401252] Hardware name: Huawei Taishan 2280 /D05, BIOS Hisilicon D05 IT21 Nemo 2.0 RC0 04/18/2018 > [ 32.419597] pstate: 80000005 (Nzcv daif -PAN -UAO) > [ 32.429213] pc : logic_outb+0x54/0xb8 > [ 32.436556] lr : f71805f_find+0x2c/0x1b8 [f71805f] > [ 32.446167] sp : ffff0000256bba90 > [ 32.452808] x29: ffff0000256bba90 x28: ffff000008b544d0 > [ 32.463468] x27: ffff0000256bbdf0 x26: 0000000000000100 > [ 32.474127] x25: 000000000000002c x24: ffff000011396000 > [ 32.484787] x23: ffff0000256bbb3e x22: ffff0000256bbb40 > [ 32.495446] x21: ffff000008b591b8 x20: 0000000000000087 > [ 32.506106] x19: 000000000000002e x18: ffffffffffffffff > [ 32.516765] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 > [ 32.527424] x15: 0000000000000400 x14: 0000000000000400 > [ 32.538084] x13: 0000000000001832 x12: 0000000000000000 > [ 32.548743] x11: ffff801ffbf08ac0 x10: 0000801fead02000 > [ 32.559403] x9 : ffff801ffbffe840 x8 : 0000000000000001 > [ 32.570062] x7 : 0000000000210d00 x6 : 0000000000000000 > [ 32.580721] x5 : ffff801fb3eac380 x4 : ffff801ffbef4b20 > [ 32.591381] x3 : 0000000000ffbffe x2 : ffff0000256bbb40 > [ 32.602040] x1 : ffff7dfffee0002e x0 : ffff7dfffee00000 > [ 32.612701] Process insmod (pid: 2681, stack limit = 0x(____ptrval____)) > [ 32.626155] Call trace: > [ 32.631050] logic_outb+0x54/0xb8 > [ 32.637693] f71805f_find+0x2c/0x1b8 [f71805f] > [ 32.646607] f71805f_init+0x38/0xe48 [f71805f] > [ 32.655521] do_one_initcall+0x5c/0x178 > [ 32.663212] do_init_module+0x58/0x1b0 > [ 32.670728] load_module+0x1dc8/0x2178 > [ 32.678243] __se_sys_init_module+0x14c/0x1e8 > [ 32.686981] __arm64_sys_init_module+0x18/0x20 > [ 32.695894] el0_svc_common+0x60/0x100 > [ 32.703409] el0_svc_handler+0x2c/0x80 > [ 32.710924] el0_svc+0x8/0xc > [ 32.716693] Code: d2bfdc00 f2cfbfe0 f2ffffe0 8b000021 (39000034) > [ 32.728925] ---[ end trace ddb5e493ee686685 ]--- > Segmentation fault > root@(none)$ > > This issue was originally reported in [1]. > > This patch changes the functionality of request_region() to request a > region of the direct children of the top ioport_resource. > > In this, if the IO port region has not been mapped for a particular IO > region, a suitable child region will not exist, and, as such, > request_region() calls will fail. > > A side note: there are many drivers in the kernel which fail to even call > request_region() prior to IO port accesses, and they also need to be fixed > (to call request_region() as appropriate). > Isn't that orthogonal to this problem ? > [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg49821.html > > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > include/linux/ioport.h | 6 +++++- > kernel/resource.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h > index da0ebaec25f0..cf40e1ed8211 100644 > --- a/include/linux/ioport.h > +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h > @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static inline bool resource_contains(struct resource *r1, struct resource *r2) > > > /* Convenience shorthand with allocation */ > -#define request_region(start,n,name) __request_region(&ioport_resource, (start), (n), (name), 0) > +#define request_region(start,n,name) __request_region_from_children(&ioport_resource, (start), (n), (name), 0) > #define request_muxed_region(start,n,name) __request_region(&ioport_resource, (start), (n), (name), IORESOURCE_MUXED) > #define __request_mem_region(start,n,name, excl) __request_region(&iomem_resource, (start), (n), (name), excl) > #define request_mem_region(start,n,name) __request_region(&iomem_resource, (start), (n), (name), 0) I can't comment on the merits of the patch (though I am a bit concerned about its impact and potential source of regressions), but I don't really understand why it would only apply to request_region() and not to request_muxed_region(). Is this an oversight or on purpose ? Guenter
