On 12/20/18 10:13 PM, Kangjie Lu wrote:
If lm80_read_value() fails, it returns a negative number instead of the
correct read data. Therefore, we should avoid using the data if it
fails.
The fix checks if lm80_read_value() fails, and if so, returns with the
error number.
Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/hwmon/lm80.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm80.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm80.c
index 08e3945a6fbf..fca6363cd77f 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm80.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm80.c
@@ -360,9 +360,11 @@ static ssize_t set_fan_div(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
unsigned long min, val;
u8 reg;
- int err = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
+ int ret;
+
In the other patch you are using 'rv'. Please use consistent variable names.
Also, please use "hwmon: (lm80) <description>" as subject, and use different subjects
for both patches so we can distinguish them without looking into each patch itself.
This applies to the other patch as well.
Thanks,
Guenter
+ ret = kstrtoul(buf, 10, &val);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
/* Save fan_min */
mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
@@ -390,8 +392,11 @@ static ssize_t set_fan_div(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
return -EINVAL;
}
- reg = (lm80_read_value(client, LM80_REG_FANDIV) &
- ~(3 << (2 * (nr + 1)))) | (data->fan_div[nr] << (2 * (nr + 1)));
+ ret = lm80_read_value(client, LM80_REG_FANDIV);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ reg = (ret & ~(3 << (2 * (nr + 1))))
+ | (data->fan_div[nr] << (2 * (nr + 1)));
lm80_write_value(client, LM80_REG_FANDIV, reg);
/* Restore fan_min */
