Hi! On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 03:29:47PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > As the driver doesn't treat the two devices differently, the enum isn't > really needed. I don't really mind though, just a notice. Yeah, I just thought it looked cleaner this way. I thought also about adding an enum chips entry to struct lm92_data, but I didn't like that because there's no use for it right now, until (if) the driver is extended to support different but similar enough chips, so I just added the enum. > > Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxx> > > Please also update Documentation/hwmon/lm92 which currently claims that > the max6635 must use "lm92" as prefix. Oh, I totally forgot about that. I'll be sending patch v2 in a couple of minutes. Thank you! -- Alvaro G. M. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
