Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (k10temp) Add support for family 17h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/04/2017 11:47 PM, Clemens Ladisch wrote:
>> Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Some of this is guesswork, but afaics it is working. No idea if there
>>> is a better way to determine the temperature offset.
>>
>> The reported value is not an absolute temperature on any CPU.
>>
>> As far as I know, the offset is not guaranteed to be fixed for any model,
>> i.e., it would be pointless to apply the offset observed on one specific
>> chip.
>
> What we should do then, as we did for coretemp, would be to collect the various
> temperature offsets (and temperature limits, for that matter) and apply per-CPU
> adjustments. Are the offsets documented somewhere ?

AMD says:
 "Tctl is the processor temperature control value, used by the platform to
  control cooling systems. Tctl is a non-physical temperature on an
  arbitrary scale measured in degrees. It does _not_ represent an actual
  physical temperature like die or case temperature. Instead, it specifies
  the processor temperature relative to the point at which the system must
  supply the maximum cooling for the processor's specified maximum case
  temperature and maximum thermal power dissipation."

(That point is defined as 70.)


Regards,
Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux