On Wed, 2024-05-29 at 14:11 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 02:03:35PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 9:46 AM Matthias Schiffer > > <matthias.schiffer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Conversion to actually use regmap does not seem useful for this driver, > > > as regmap can't properly represent separate read-only and write-only > > > registers at the same address, but we can at least match the API to make > > > the code clearer. > > > > > > No functional change intended. > > > > > > Fixes: b868db94a6a7 ("gpio: tqmx86: Add GPIO from for this IO controller") > > > > This is not a fix. > > Agreed. > > I'm somewhat conflicted by this patch. It is a step towards using > regmap, but then says regmap does not make sense. So why make that > step? > > Changing the order of parameters like this seems like it is will make > back porting bug fixes harder, unless all supported versions are > changed, which is why fixes make sense. Does the compiler at least > issue a warning if the parameters are used the wrong way around? > > Overall, i'm leaning towards just dropping it. > > Andrew Okay, will drop this patch. Matthias