On 29/05/2024 07:13, Andrew Jeffery wrote: > It shouldn't have been the case that it wasn't required. The kernel > devicetrees already specified it where compatible nodes were defined, > and u-boot pulls in the kernel devicetrees, so this should have minimal > practical impact. > This should be squashed with previous patch. Best regards, Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,sgpio: Require #interrupt-cells
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,sgpio: Require #interrupt-cells
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 09:28:55 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20240529-dt-warnings-gpio-sgpio-interrupt-cells-v1-4-91c42976833b@codeconstruct.com.au>
- References: <20240529-dt-warnings-gpio-sgpio-interrupt-cells-v1-0-91c42976833b@codeconstruct.com.au> <20240529-dt-warnings-gpio-sgpio-interrupt-cells-v1-4-91c42976833b@codeconstruct.com.au>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,sgpio: Require #interrupt-cells
- From: Andrew Jeffery
- Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,sgpio: Require #interrupt-cells
- References:
- [PATCH 0/4] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,sgpio: Miscellaneous cleanups
- From: Andrew Jeffery
- [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,sgpio: Require #interrupt-cells
- From: Andrew Jeffery
- [PATCH 0/4] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,sgpio: Miscellaneous cleanups
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,sgpio: Specify #interrupt-cells
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: pinctrl-zynqmp: Use pin numbers stored in pin descriptor
- Previous by thread: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,sgpio: Require #interrupt-cells
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: aspeed,sgpio: Require #interrupt-cells
- Index(es):
 |