Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] gpio: adp5585: Add Analog Devices ADP5585 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tue, May 28, 2024 at 10:03:13PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart kirjoitti:
> From: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx>
> 
> The ADP5585 is a 10/11 input/output port expander with a built in keypad
> matrix decoder, programmable logic, reset generator, and PWM generator.
> This driver supports the GPIO function using the platform device
> registered by the core MFD driver.
> 
> The driver is derived from an initial implementation from NXP, available
> in commit 451f61b46b76 ("MLK-25917-2 gpio: adp5585-gpio: add
> adp5585-gpio support") in their BSP kernel tree. It has been extensively
> rewritten.

Why is this not using gpio-regmap?

...

> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/adp5585.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>

+ types.h

...

> +	bit = off * 2 + (off > 5 ? 4 : 0);

Right, but can you use >= 6 here which immediately follows to the next
question, i.e. why not use bank in this conditional?

...

> +	struct adp5585_dev *adp5585 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);

(see below)

> +	struct adp5585_gpio_dev *adp5585_gpio;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;

	struct adp5585_dev *adp5585 = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);

> +	struct gpio_chip *gc;
> +	int ret;

...

> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, adp5585_gpio);

Any use of driver data?

...

> +	device_set_of_node_from_dev(dev, dev->parent);

Why not device_set_node()?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux