On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 08:44:20PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 02:02:34PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: ... > It also doesn't like looping on find results in patch 4[2], though that > is not related to your change, so leave it and I'll fix it later? Does it really mean _to fix_ rather than _to "fix"_? I mean how do we know that shellcheck is 100% correct tool and has no bugs? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH libgpiod v2 2/4] tools: tests: use "$@" instead of $*
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH libgpiod v2 2/4] tools: tests: use "$@" instead of $*
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 19:20:01 +0300
- In-reply-to: <20240527124420.GA108041@rigel>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20240527-fix-bash-tests-v2-0-05d90cea24cd@linaro.org> <20240527-fix-bash-tests-v2-2-05d90cea24cd@linaro.org> <20240527124420.GA108041@rigel>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH libgpiod v2 2/4] tools: tests: use "$@" instead of $*
- From: Kent Gibson
- Re: [PATCH libgpiod v2 2/4] tools: tests: use "$@" instead of $*
- References:
- [PATCH libgpiod v2 0/4] tools: tests: fix a few issues in bash scripts
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- [PATCH libgpiod v2 2/4] tools: tests: use "$@" instead of $*
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [PATCH libgpiod v2 2/4] tools: tests: use "$@" instead of $*
- From: Kent Gibson
- [PATCH libgpiod v2 0/4] tools: tests: fix a few issues in bash scripts
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH libgpiod v2 2/4] tools: tests: use "$@" instead of $*
- Next by Date: [PATCH] gpiolib: make gpiochip_set_desc_names() return void
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH libgpiod v2 2/4] tools: tests: use "$@" instead of $*
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH libgpiod v2 2/4] tools: tests: use "$@" instead of $*
- Index(es):
 |