On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 12:24 PM Esben Haabendal <esben@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As not all mach-imx platforms has support for run-time changes of pin > configurations (such as LS1021A), a more selective approach to enabling > pinctrl infrastructure makes sense, so that an e.g. an LS1021A only kernel > could be built without pinctrl support. > > This is a very late follow up v1 3 years ago [1]. The situation seems to be > unchanged since then, and I have tried to incorporate the requested > changes. What is the verdict from the i.MX pin control maintainers on this? I can merge this into the pin control tree for v6.11 but it'd be nice to get an ACK from the maintainers first. Yours, Linus Walleij