Re: [PATCH libgpiod 2/4] tools: tests: use $@ instead of $*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 3:54 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 08:03:28PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > $@ does not break up quoted arguments which is what we want in all cases
> > in the bash test-suite. Use it instead of $*.
> >
>
> I believe it needs to be "$@".  Everywhere.
>
> Where do we use quoted arguments/whitespaced parameters?
> So this is purely about "good" shell?  In that case why stop here - e.g.
> shellcheck picks up a load more "Double quote to prevent splitting/globbing"
> and the like.
>

You're not wrong but I have an impression that this is just a
sarcastic way of telling me this change is not needed. Could you
confirm?

> > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tools/gpio-tools-test.bash | 12 ++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/gpio-tools-test.bash b/tools/gpio-tools-test.bash
> > index abb2f5d..8b4f054 100755
> > --- a/tools/gpio-tools-test.bash
> > +++ b/tools/gpio-tools-test.bash
> > @@ -27,10 +27,10 @@ GPIOSIM_APP_NAME="gpio-tools-test"
> >  MIN_KERNEL_VERSION="5.17.4"
> >  MIN_SHUNIT_VERSION="2.1.8"
> >
> > -# Run the command in $* and fail the test if the command succeeds.
> > +# Run the command in $@ and fail the test if the command succeeds.
> >  assert_fail() {
> > -     $* || return 0
> > -     fail " '$*': command did not fail as expected"
> > +     $@ || return 0
> > +     fail " '$@': command did not fail as expected"
> >  }
> >
> >  # Check if the string in $2 matches against the pattern in $1.
> > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ gpiosim_chip() {
> >
> >       mkdir -p $BANKPATH
> >
> > -     for ARG in $*
> > +     for ARG in $@
> >       do
> >               local KEY=$(echo $ARG | cut -d"=" -f1)
> >               local VAL=$(echo $ARG | cut -d"=" -f2)
> > @@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ dut_regex_match() {
> >  }
> >
> >  dut_write() {
> > -     echo $* >&${COPROC[1]}
> > +     echo $@ >&${COPROC[1]}
> >  }
> >
>
> Does echo care?  I realise a linter, and that includes Andy, will complain
> here, but is there a practical difference?
>

The practical difference that comes to mind is passing less arguments
to echo but I don't know if that really matters.

Bart

> Cheers,
> Kent.
>
> >  dut_kill() {
> > @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ tearDown() {
> >  }
> >
> >  request_release_line() {
> > -     $SOURCE_DIR/gpioget -c $* >/dev/null
> > +     $SOURCE_DIR/gpioget -c $@ >/dev/null
> >  }
> >
> >  #
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux