On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 8:30 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 6:06 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:48:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 06:42:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 04:23:07PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 3:58 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > > > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > > > > Fair enough but I would like to know what your bigger plan is before > > > > > picking this up. > > > > > > > > I stand corrected, this patch has an immediate effect on the generic > > > > gpiolib_dbg_show() which does *not* use the above mentioned call.. > > > > > > Ah, but it doesn't use gpiod_get_label() in the else branch either... > > > > > > I want to amend the else branch there to print similar or reuse the main one. > > > For the latter I have locally a patch to modify gpiolib_dbg_show() to show > > > the interrupt lines as well even if they are not requested. > > > > I just shared that patch, if you are okay with both, it would be nice > > to have them applied. > > Not for this merge window, we'll see in two weeks. No hurry, I'm fine with your schedule. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko