> -----Original Message----- > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: 2024年4月25日 21:07 > To: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: vf610: always set GPIO to input mode when used as > interrupt source > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 1:01 PM Bough Chen <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Bough Chen > > > Sent: 2024年4月23日 20:21 > > > To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: brgl@xxxxxxxx; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH] gpio: vf610: always set GPIO to input mode when > > > used as interrupt source > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: 2024年4月23日 19:41 > > > > To: Bough Chen <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: brgl@xxxxxxxx; linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > > > linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: vf610: always set GPIO to input mode > > > > when used as interrupt source > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 4:28 AM <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > From: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > > Though the default pin configuration is INPUT, but if the prior > > > > > stage does configure the pins as OUTPUT, then Linux will not > > > > > reconfigure the pin as INPUT. > > > > > > > > > > e.g. When use one pin as interrupt source, and set as low level > > > > > trigger, if prior stage already set this pin as OUTPUT low, then > > > > > will meet interrupt storm. > > > > > > > > > > So always set GPIO to input mode when used as interrupt source > > > > > to fix above case. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@xxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c | 2 +- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c > > > > > b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c index 07e5e6323e86..305b0bcdee6f > > > > > 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c > > > > > @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int vf610_gpio_irq_set_type(struct > > > > > irq_data *d, > > > > u32 type) > > > > > else > > > > > irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_edge_irq); > > > > > > > > > > - return 0; > > > > > + return port->gc.direction_input(&port->gc, d->hwirq); > > > > > > > > Just call vf610_gpio_direction_input() instead of indirecting > > > > through > > > > gc->direction_input(), no need to jump through the vtable and as > > > > Bartosz says: it just makes that struct vulnerable. > > > > > > Thanks for your quick review, I will do that in V2. > > > > > > > > > > > Second: > > > > > > > > In this patch also implement gc->get_direction() which is > > > > currently unimplemented. If you are going to change the direction > > > > of a GPIO randomly at runtime then the framework really likes to > > > > have a chance to know the current direction for obvious reasons. > > > > > > Yes, will implement gc->get_direction(), if we did this before, then > > > for this case we meet, framework will print out error log, save much debug > time. > > > > Hi Linus, > > > > I implement gc->get_direction() today, for the case to request one > > gpio as irq, gpio architecture will first call gpiochip_reqres_irq(), > > if the ROM or Uboot already config this gpio pin as OUTPUT mode, will get the > following log: > > > > [ 2.714889] gpio gpiochip3: (43850000.gpio): gpiochip_lock_as_irq: tried > to flag a GPIO set as output for IRQ > > [ 2.724816] gpio gpiochip3: (43850000.gpio): unable to lock HW IRQ 11 > for IRQ > > [ 2.731972] genirq: Failed to request resources for 2-0050 (irq 211) on > irqchip gpio-vf610 > > > > Any suggested method to avoid this case? My previous method works because > driver lack of gc->get_direction(). > > > > Can you make the driver default all lines to input when the device is being > registered? Possibly also revert to input when the line is being freed? Yes, this should be a better method, I will have a try. Thanks Haibo Chen > > Bartosz