RE: [PATCH v3 00/24] gpio: rework locking and object life-time control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, April 20, 2024 5:29 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 09:04, Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bartosz Golaszewski,
> >
> > I ran into a kernel crash problem when I pull the latest net-next.git, and
> > finally it was found that is caused by this patch series merged.
> >
> > The kernel crashed because I got gpio=0 when I called irq_find_mapping()
> > and then struct irq_data *d=null, as my driver describes:
> >
> >         int gpio = irq_find_mapping(gc->irq.domain, hwirq);
> >         struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(gpio);
> >
> >         txgbe_gpio_irq_ack(d);
> >
> > The deeper positioning is this line in __irq_resolve_mapping().
> >
> >         data = rcu_dereference(domain->revmap[hwirq]);
> >
> > So, is it the addition of SRCU infrastructure that causes this issue?
> >
> 
> This is irq-specific RCU that I did not add in the GPIO series. Please
> provide us with more information. Bisect to the exact commit causing
> the issue and post the kernel log (we don't know what kind of crash
> you trigger and what the stack trace is).
> 
> Bart
> 

Hi Bartosz & Andy,

Thanks for your replies.

I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, and glad this patch doesn't cause any
problems. I thought the issue was in this patch because of my mistake.
It's actually caused by other patches. :)









[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux