On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 02:06:05PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:32 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > In the cases when gpio_is_valid() is called with unsigned parameter > > the result is always true in the GPIO library code, hence the check > > for false won't ever be true. Get rid of such calls. > > > > While at it, move GPIO device base to be unsigned to clearly show > > it won't ever be negative. This requires a new definition for the > > maximum GPIO number in the system. > > --- > > It looks like a risky change that late in the release cycle. I want to > avoid some CI problems at rc6. Please resend it once v6.9-rc1 is > tagged. Not sure why resend, but I missed that somehow. Can you consider applying it? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko