Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: devicetree: fix refcount leak in pinctrl_dt_to_map()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>                   … Because the pinctrl_dt_free_maps() includes the
> droping operation, here we call it directly.

I find this change description improvable.

* How do you think about to avoid a typo?

* Would another imperative wording be more desirable?

Regards,
Markus





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux