Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] gpiolib: Fix a mess with the GPIO_* flags

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 11:42:37AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 1:17 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The GPIO_* flag definitions are *almost* duplicated in two files
> > (with unmatches OPEN_SOURCE / OPEN_DRAIN). Moreover, some code relies
> > on one set of definitions while the rest is on the other. Clean up
> > this mess by providing only one source of the definitions to all.
> >
> > Fixes: b424808115cb ("brcm80211: brcmsmac: Move LEDs to GPIO descriptors")
> > Fixes: 5923ea6c2ce6 ("gpio: pass lookup and descriptor flags to request_own")
> > Fixes: fed7026adc7c ("gpiolib: Make use of enum gpio_lookup_flags consistent")
> > Fixes: 4c0facddb7d8 ("gpio: core: Decouple open drain/source flag with active low/high")
> > Fixes: 69d301fdd196 ("gpio: add DT bindings for existing consumer flags")
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c                     |  5 ++---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c                        |  8 +++-----
> >  .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmsmac/led.c         |  2 +-
> >  include/linux/gpio/driver.h                   |  3 +--
> >  include/linux/gpio/machine.h                  | 20 +++++--------------
> >  5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> I don't think ./dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h is the right source of these
> defines for everyone - including non-OF systems. I would prefer the
> ones in include/linux/gpio/machine.h be the upstream source but then
> headers in include/dt-bindings/ cannot include them so my second-best
> suggestion is to rename the ones in include/linux/gpio/machine.h and
> treewide too. In general values from ./dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h should
> only be used in DTS sources and gpiolib-of code.

Then, please fix that your way. It's quite annoying issue.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko