On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 11:07:43PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:50:28PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 07:07:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 6:35 PM Charles Keepax > > > <ckeepax@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 11:47:36PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > > Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:47:30AM +0000, Charles Keepax kirjoitti: > > ... > > > > > > > +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> > > > > > > > > > > Hmm... Is it requirement by gpiolib-swnode? (I haven't looked at the use cases, > > > > > I'm not the author of this idea, hence the Q). > > > > > > > > It's required for the GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW used in the swnode stuff. > > > > > > Seems to me like you are mistaken. > > > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-swnode.c#L85 > > > > Okay, I stand corrected, under "native" the GPIO_* are assumed. > > > > But what you need is to include gpio/property.h for that, and not directly > > the DT header. > > Oh, my, we have two _almost_ identical definitions in machine.h and under DT. > So, I believe we are using ones from machine.h. > Yeah that is my bad I should be using those instead. Thanks, Charles