Re: [PATCH v6 08/11] pinctrl: k210: Deprecate SOC_CANAAN and use SOC_CANAAN_K210

[Yangyu Chen <cyy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> On Apr 2, 2024, at 20:31, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 1:13 PM Yangyu Chen <cyy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Since SOC_FOO should be deprecated from patch [1], and cleanup for other
>> SoCs is already on the mailing list [2,3,4], we remove the use of
>> SOC_CANAAN and introduced SOC_CANAAN_K210 for K210-specific drivers,
>> 
>> Thus, we replace its drivers depends on SOC_CANAAN_K210 and default select
>> when it has the symbol SOC_CANAAN_K210.
>> 
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221121221414.109965-1-conor@xxxxxxxxxx/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-praying-clad-c4fbcaa7ed0a@spud/
>> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-fled-undrilled-41dc0c46bb29@spud/
>> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-stress-earflap-d7ddb8655a4d@spud/
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

Please add Acked-by to this email [1]. I will separate them in the next
revision.

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/tencent_DB11214C8D0D7C48829ADA128E7BB8F13108@xxxxxx/

Thanks.

> Is this patch something I can just apply to the pinctrl tree?
> 

I think not. As Conor said.

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij