On 28.03.2024 21:51, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: >>> +static void rzv2h_pinctrl_pm_setup_pfc(struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl) >> Have you managed to test this? >> > No S2R isn't tested and is just added for completeness, I wonder if we > should have a SoC specific flag "pm_supported" for this, as apart from > RZ/G3S nothing has been tested I believe? Yes, only RZ/G3S PM has been tested.
Re: [RFC PATCH 13/13] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add support for RZ/V2H SoC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/13] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add support for RZ/V2H SoC
- From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 08:36:26 +0200
- In-reply-to: <CA+V-a8uegButH84aUY1N+0GzZx2LkRBTxNtg7y1Y-cUvvFfJpw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20240326222844.1422948-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20240326222844.1422948-14-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <25bc9ceb-c5cb-40a2-8c3d-d9666b88546c@tuxon.dev> <CA+V-a8uegButH84aUY1N+0GzZx2LkRBTxNtg7y1Y-cUvvFfJpw@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
- References:
- [RFC PATCH 00/13] Add PFC support for Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC
- From: Prabhakar
- [RFC PATCH 13/13] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add support for RZ/V2H SoC
- From: Prabhakar
- Re: [RFC PATCH 13/13] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add support for RZ/V2H SoC
- From: claudiu beznea
- Re: [RFC PATCH 13/13] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add support for RZ/V2H SoC
- From: Lad, Prabhakar
- [RFC PATCH 00/13] Add PFC support for Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC
- Prev by Date: Re: pinctrl: single: Cannot disable bias - PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE not handled
- Next by Date: [PATCH 00/18] platform/chrome: provide ID table for avoiding fallback match
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/13] pinctrl: renesas: pinctrl-rzg2l: Add support for RZ/V2H SoC
- Next by thread: [brgl:gpio/for-current] BUILD SUCCESS 5c887b65bbd1a3fc28e2e20399acede0baa83edb
- Index(es):
 |