Re: [PATCH 02/22] um: virt-pci: drop owner assignment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27/03/2024 14:34, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-03-27 at 13:40 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> virtio core already sets the .owner, so driver does not need to.
> 
>> All further patches depend on the first virtio patch, therefore please ack
>> and this should go via one tree: virtio?
> 
> Sure. Though it's not really actually necessary, you can set it in the
> core and merge the other patches in the next cycle; those drivers that
> _have_ an .owner aren't broken after all.
> 
> Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

True, this can be spread over two cycles. What I wanted to express, is
that maintainers should not pick individual patches.

Thanks for the Ack and apologies for a bit too big CC-list. I need to
learn how to ask b4 to make Cc-per-patch for such case.



Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux