Re: [PATCH v6 05/11] riscv: Kconfig.socs: Split ARCH_CANAAN and SOC_CANAAN_K210

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 08:12:17PM +0800, Yangyu Chen wrote:
> Since SOC_FOO should be deprecated from patch [1], and cleanup for other
> SoCs is already on the mailing list [2,3,4], we remove the use of
> SOC_CANAAN and use ARCH_CANAAN for SoCs vendored by Canaan instead from
> now on. And allows ARCH_CANAAN to be selected for other Canaan SoCs.
> 
> Then, since we have Canaan Kendryte K230 with MMU now, the use of
> SOC_CANAAN is no longer only referred to K210. Thus, we introduce a new
> symbol SOC_CANAAN_K210 for any conditional code or driver selection
> specific to the K210, so users will not try to build some K210-specific
> things when MMU is enabled and see it fails to boot on K210.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20221121221414.109965-1-conor@xxxxxxxxxx/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-praying-clad-c4fbcaa7ed0a@spud/
> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-fled-undrilled-41dc0c46bb29@spud/
> [4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240305-stress-earflap-d7ddb8655a4d@spud/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs                        | 8 +++++---
>  arch/riscv/Makefile                            | 2 +-
>  arch/riscv/configs/nommu_k210_defconfig        | 3 ++-
>  arch/riscv/configs/nommu_k210_sdcard_defconfig | 3 ++-
>  4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> index 623de5f8a208..5710aee456ac 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig.socs
> @@ -72,11 +72,13 @@ config SOC_VIRT
>  	  This enables support for QEMU Virt Machine.
>  
>  config ARCH_CANAAN
> -	def_bool SOC_CANAAN
> +	bool "Canaan Kendryte SoC"
> +	help
> +	  This enables support for Canaan Kendryte SoC platform hardware.
>  
> -config SOC_CANAAN
> +config SOC_CANAAN_K210

This breaks git bisect, right?  There are references to SOC_CANAAN that
are get updated later in the patch series.  You can't delete SOC_CANAAN
and leave the other references dangling.

regards,
dan carpenter





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux