Hello, On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 16:30:09 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 04:04:53PM +0530, Bhargav Raviprakash wrote: > > @@ -374,11 +518,17 @@ static int tps6594_request_reg_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, > > { > > struct tps6594_regulator_irq_type *irq_type; > > struct tps6594 *tps = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); > > - int j; > > + size_t j; > > int irq; > > int error; > > + size_t interrupt_cnt; > > + > > + if (tps->chip_id == TPS6594) > > + interrupt_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tps6594_buck1_irq_types); > > + else > > + interrupt_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65224_buck1_irq_types); > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > > - for (j = 0; j < REGS_INT_NB; j++) { > > + for (j = 0; j < interrupt_cnt; j++) { > > irq_type = &tps6594_regs_irq_types[j]; > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, irq_type->irq_name); > > if (irq < 0) > > The tps6594_regs_irq_types pointer needs to be renamed or people won't > know it's holding tps65224_ data. Probably the function should be > renamed too. > > regards, > dan carpenter Thanks for the feedback! The name will be changed in the next version. Regards, Bhargav