Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: nomadik: Back out some managed resources

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:20 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:09 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Several commits introduce managed resources (devm_*) into the
> > nmk_gpio_populate_chip() function.
> >
> > This isn't always working because when called from the Nomadik pin
> > control driver we just want to populate some states for the device as
> > the same states are used by the pin control driver.
> >
> > Some managed resources such as devm_kzalloc() etc will work, as the
> > passed in platform device will be used for lifecycle management,
> > but in some cases where we used the looked-up platform device
> > for the GPIO block, this will cause problems for the combined
> > pin control and GPIO driver, because it adds managed resources
> > to the GPIO device before it is probed, which is something that
> > the device core will not accept, and all of the GPIO blocks will
> > refuse to probe:
> >
> > platform 8012e000.gpio: Resources present before probing
> > platform 8012e080.gpio: Resources present before probing
> > (...)
> >
> > Fix this by not tying any managed resources to the looked-up
> > gpio_pdev/gpio_dev device, let's just live with the fact that
> > these need imperative resource management for now.
> >
> > Drop in some notes and use a local *dev variable to clarify the
> > code.
>
> LGTM, some minor remarks below.
>
> ...
>
> > Cc: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Note, you can put Cc:s after --- line and it won't go to the commit
> message while Cc to the respective people.

Yeah old habit, actually b4 handles it fine by recording the
recipients only in the cover letter.

> > +               dev_dbg(dev, "populate: using default ngpio (%d)\n", ngpio);
>
> While at it %d --> %u.
(...)
> > +               dev_err(dev, "failed getting reset control: %ld\n",
> >                         PTR_ERR(reset));
>
> Also possible %pe.

Fixed them both when applying! Thanks!

Yours,
Linus Walleij





[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux