Hey folks, On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:31:15AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 09:32:11AM +0200, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > cause. I also do not have a good toolchain setup for compiling custom > > > kernels for this setup (and limited time for setting up one), so I do > > > not expect to be able to provide more testing or a patch anytime soon. Thanks for the suggestions for buildall, but when I said "toolchain", I did not really refer to the actual gcc toolchain (I have that from Debian packages), I meant more like knowing what kernel tree is used on the board I am using (I've asked the maintainer of the image, no reply yet), what kernel configuration to use, figuring out the right way to deploy the kernel for that particular board. Maybe I should have used workflow rather than "toolchain". Wrt the suggestion made earlier to submit a patch even if untested - I'll see if I can whip something up next week. Gr. Matthijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
