On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:28:07PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 7:57 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:52:53PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > This devm API takes a consumer device as an argument to setup the devm > > > action, but throws it away when calling further into gpiolib. This leads > > > to odd debug messages like this: > > > > > > (NULL device *): using DT '/gpio-keys/switch-pen-insert' for '(null)' GPIO lookup > > > > > > Let's pass the consumer device down, by directly calling what > > > fwnode_gpiod_get_index() calls but pass the device used for devm. This > > > changes the message to look like this instead: > > > > > > gpio-keys gpio-keys: using DT '/gpio-keys/switch-pen-insert' for '(null)' GPIO lookup > > > > > > Note that callers of fwnode_gpiod_get_index() will still see the NULL > > > device pointer debug message, but there's not much we can do about that > > > because the API doesn't take a struct device. > > > > Have you seen this? > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231019173457.2445119-1-andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Clearly yes as I queued the first one in that series. The rest did not > make its way upstream for whatever reason. What is your point? You > want to respin it? It was a reply to Stephen. :-) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko