Re: [PATCH] gpio: sim: don't fiddle with GPIOLIB private members

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 05:01:04PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 4:59 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 05:46:27PM -0800, Saravana Kannan wrote:

...

> > Is there any _good_ documentation for devlinks and all that fields in the
> > struct fwnode? Why should we use that without any understanding of the
> > purposes of that field. We, as device property developers, hadn't introduced
> > that field and never required it. It's an alien to device properties APIs.
> 
> If I add some inline documentation for these fields, will you be more
> open to letting people use this as a way to look up devices? I'm happy
> to do that for you.

I consider documentation patches to be always welcome. But it doesn't mean
we allow to use that fields in device property APIs without a very good
justification.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko






[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux