On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:28 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:48:00AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 8:36 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > There is no need to repeat for-loop twice in the error path in > > > gpiochip_add_data_with_key(). Deduplicate it. While at it, > > > rename loop variable to be more specific and avoid ambguity. > > > > > > It also properly unwinds the SRCU, i.e. in reversed order of allocating. > > ... > > > This doesn't apply on top of gpio/for-next, I think it depends on one > > of your earlier patches? > > Yes, on the fix with error path. > > ... > > > > + while (desc_index--) > > > > What about gdev->descs[0]? > > What about it? :-) > > for (i = i - 1; i >= 0; i--) > while (--i >= 0) > while (i--) > > are all equivalents. > > The difference is what the value will i get _after_ the loop. Ugh of course. But the first one is more readable given I got tricked by variant #3 at a quick glance but the for loop says out loud what it does. Bart > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >