On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 09:52:48AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
...
> Fixes: d83cee3d2bb1 ("gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU")
I'm wondering if instead tons of fixes you can just fold the patches and rebase your tree.
Yes, we still have time to let it soak in Linux Next, so Torvalds won't complain.
It will be much less burden to anybody who wants to backport this nice work.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH] gpio: sysfs: fix inverted pointer logic
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: sysfs: fix inverted pointer logic
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 14:52:15 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20240214085248.6534-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
- Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
- References: <20240214085248.6534-1-brgl@bgdev.pl>
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: sysfs: fix inverted pointer logic
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [PATCH] gpio: sysfs: fix inverted pointer logic
- References:
- [PATCH] gpio: sysfs: fix inverted pointer logic
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- [PATCH] gpio: sysfs: fix inverted pointer logic
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v6 003/164] pwm: Provide pwmchip_alloc() function and a devm variant of it
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] gpio: fix SRCU bugs
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] gpio: sysfs: fix inverted pointer logic
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] gpio: sysfs: fix inverted pointer logic
- Index(es):
 |