On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 4:12 PM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Consistently use active/inactive to describe logical line values, rather > than high/low, which is used for physical values, or asserted/de-asserted > which is awkward. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> Thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: consistent use of logical line value terminology
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: consistent use of logical line value terminology
- From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 16:19:25 +0200
- In-reply-to: <20240213141222.382457-1-warthog618@gmail.com>
- References: <20240213141222.382457-1-warthog618@gmail.com>
- References:
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: consistent use of logical line value terminology
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] gpio: initialize descriptor SRCU structure before adding OF-based chips
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: consistent use of logical line value terminology
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: gpio: consistent use of logical line value terminology
- Index(es):
 |