On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 1:03 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:31:08AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Lockdep with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU enabled reports false positives about > > suspicious rcu_dereference() usage. Let's silence it by using > > rcu_dereference_protected(). > > > > Fixes: d83cee3d2bb1 ("gpio: protect the pointer to gpio_chip in gpio_device with SRCU") > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@xxxxxxxxx> > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202402122234.d85cca9b-lkp@xxxxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 12 ++++++++---- > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h | 4 +++- > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > index c1391a9a0af6..d7503376b918 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c > > @@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ const char *gpiod_get_label(struct gpio_desc *desc) > > return "interrupt"; > > > > return test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &flags) ? > > - rcu_dereference(desc->label) : NULL; > > + rcu_dereference_protected(desc->label, > > + lockdep_is_held(&desc->srcu)) : NULL; > > Why not this instead? > > > + srcu_dereference(desc->label, &desc->srcu) : NULL; > > And similarly for the rest of the changes. > Ah, I missed this one. Thanks, I'll use it. For patch 1/3 in this series - should I stick with rcu_access_pointer() or is it better to use srcu_dereference here as well? Bart > Thanx, Paul > > > } > > > > static int desc_set_label(struct gpio_desc *desc, const char *label) > > @@ -2978,7 +2979,8 @@ static int gpiod_get_raw_value_commit(const struct gpio_desc *desc) > > > > guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu); > > > > - gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip); > > + gc = rcu_dereference_protected(gdev->chip, > > + lockdep_is_held(&gdev->srcu)); > > if (!gc) > > return -ENODEV; > > > > @@ -3012,7 +3014,8 @@ static bool gpio_device_chip_cmp(struct gpio_device *gdev, struct gpio_chip *gc) > > { > > guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu); > > > > - return gc == rcu_dereference(gdev->chip); > > + return gc == rcu_dereference_protected(gdev->chip, > > + lockdep_is_held(&gdev->srcu)); > > } > > > > int gpiod_get_array_value_complex(bool raw, bool can_sleep, > > @@ -3593,7 +3596,8 @@ int gpiod_to_irq(const struct gpio_desc *desc) > > gdev = desc->gdev; > > /* FIXME Cannot use gpio_chip_guard due to const desc. */ > > guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu); > > - gc = rcu_dereference(gdev->chip); > > + gc = rcu_dereference_protected(gdev->chip, > > + lockdep_is_held(&gdev->srcu)); > > if (!gc) > > return -ENODEV; > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > > index 07443d26cbca..a857848b8955 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ > > #include <linux/err.h> > > #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> /* for enum gpiod_flags */ > > #include <linux/gpio/driver.h> > > +#include <linux/lockdep.h> > > #include <linux/module.h> > > #include <linux/notifier.h> > > #include <linux/srcu.h> > > @@ -202,7 +203,8 @@ DEFINE_CLASS(gpio_chip_guard, > > > > _guard.gdev = desc->gdev; > > _guard.idx = srcu_read_lock(&_guard.gdev->srcu); > > - _guard.gc = rcu_dereference(_guard.gdev->chip); > > + _guard.gc = rcu_dereference_protected(_guard.gdev->chip, > > + lockdep_is_held(&_guard.gdev->srcu)); > > > > _guard; > > }), > > -- > > 2.40.1 > >