Re: [PATCH v3 23/24] gpio: remove the RW semaphore from the GPIO device

[Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 6:37 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 10:59:19AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > With all accesses to gdev->chip being protected with SRCU, we can now
> > remove the RW-semaphore specific to the character device which
> > fullfilled the same role up to this point.
> >
>
> fulfilled
>
> > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 1 -
> >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      | 4 ----
> >  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.h      | 5 -----
> >  3 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> > index ccdeed013f6b..9323b357df43 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> > @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
> >  #include <linux/poll.h>
> >  #include <linux/rbtree.h>
> > -#include <linux/rwsem.h>
> >  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> >  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> >  #include <linux/timekeeping.h>
>
> Shouldn't this be part of the rwsem -> srcu switch in the previous
> patch?
>

That other patch was already huge. I figured this should be separate.

Bart

> Other than those nits, FWIW the series looks good to me.
>
> Cheers,
> Kent.