On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 12:40:23PM +0200, Arturas Moskvinas wrote: > > On 2/1/24 16:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Arturas Moskvinas wrote: > > > GPINTEN register contains information about GPIOs with enabled > > > interrupts no need to check other GPIOs for changes. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Arturas Moskvinas<arturas.moskvinas@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > You forgot to add a changelog here, but no need to resend, just you can respond > > to the email since it's not a big issue in this case. > Ack. > > > + if (mcp_read(mcp, MCP_GPINTEN, &gpinten)) > > > + goto unlock; > > Do all hw variants have this register available? > > Esp. I2C part, wouldn't it be problematic (exception with NACK on the bus)? > According to specification sheets MCP(s0)17 [1] page 19, MCP(s0)18 [2] page > 19, MCP(s0)08 [3] page 11 - all supported expanders have that register also > that register needs to be used [4] to mask/unmask interrupts on given GPIO, > without it - expander won't even fire an interrupt. I tested on MCP23018 I2C > expander though but module itself is not treating that expander differently > for interrupt handling purposes. Thank you for the clarification! > Do you want that information to be added as part of commit message or > information in the mailing thread will be enough? Up to maintainers. I'm fine with this email. If Linus uses b4 to generate a Link tag to this discussion it will be enough (in my opinion). > [1] https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/APID/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/MCP23017-Data-Sheet-DS20001952.pdf > [2] https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/APID/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/MCP23018-Data-Sheet-DS20002103.pdf > [3] https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/APID/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/MCP23008-MCP23S08-Data-Sheet-DS20001919.pdf > [4] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7/source/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08.c#L473 -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko